# Difference between revisions of "Talk:Definite Majority Choice"

From Electowiki

(So ties have to be discussed) |
|||

Line 7: | Line 7: | ||

</pre> | </pre> | ||

Here no "majority agrees" that any candidate should be eliminated! | Here no "majority agrees" that any candidate should be eliminated! | ||

+ | |||

+ | == So ties have to be discussed == | ||

+ | |||

+ | I think I sent a suggestion in private email, but here it is again. | ||

+ | |||

+ | The initial page I put up was intended as a public elections proposal. So I wasn't thinking about ties. | ||

+ | |||

+ | In DMC, we eliminate candidates that lose pairwise matches to higher-approved candidates. Call the set of remaining candidates P. | ||

+ | |||

+ | If there is a tie, or if in a public election there is a near-tie (difference of, say, 0.01%), what about forming the superset P*, the union of all P's resulting from all possible reversed close races. | ||

+ | |||

+ | Then choose the winner by [[Random Ballot]]. |

## Revision as of 15:56, 18 March 2005

Please let us avoid the term "majority" when there need not be any majority involved! Look at this:

1 A>>B>C 1 B>>C>A 1 C>>A>B 3 A=B=C

Here no "majority agrees" that any candidate should be eliminated!

## So ties have to be discussed

I think I sent a suggestion in private email, but here it is again.

The initial page I put up was intended as a public elections proposal. So I wasn't thinking about ties.

In DMC, we eliminate candidates that lose pairwise matches to higher-approved candidates. Call the set of remaining candidates P.

If there is a tie, or if in a public election there is a near-tie (difference of, say, 0.01%), what about forming the superset P*, the union of all P's resulting from all possible reversed close races.

Then choose the winner by Random Ballot.