Difference between revisions of "Non-compulsory support criterion"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(clarified)
(added irv)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Non-compulsory support criterion''' was devised in 2005 by Thomas Smith. A voting method satisfies the Non-compulsory Support criterion if it provides a means for the voter to exclude one or more candidates from supportive ranking or rating, ''and by doing so'', not causing harm to any supported candidates or help to non-supported candidates.  Methods that satisfy this criterion include [[Approval voting]], [[Range voting]], [[Bucklin voting]], and  [[Borda count]] that is voter truncated from the low rankings.  Methods that do not satisfy this criterion include [[Condorcet method]]s, [[plurality voting]], standard [[Borda count]], modified Borda count (voter truncated from the high rankings) and [[Single Transferable Vote]] methods. For example, Approval and Range voting allow the voter to rate any candidate with a zero, which effectively does not give those candidates any advantage and does not harm the chances of the positively rated candidates.  Voter-truncated Borda count from the low rankings allows the voter to not rank any candidate, thus giving those candidates no points in the tallies, but gives the supported candidates the same high-ranking point values as a standard Borda count.
+
The '''Non-compulsory support criterion''' was devised in 2005 by Thomas Smith. A voting method satisfies the Non-compulsory Support criterion if it provides a means for the voter to exclude one or more candidates from supportive ranking or rating, ''and by doing so'', not causing harm to any supported candidates or help to non-supported candidates.  Methods that satisfy this criterion include [[Approval voting]], [[Range voting]], [[Bucklin voting]], and  [[Borda count]] that is voter truncated from the low rankings.  Methods that do not satisfy this criterion include [[Condorcet method]]s, [[plurality voting]], standard [[Borda count]], modified Borda count (voter truncated from the high rankings) and [[Single Transferable Vote]] methods (such as [[Instant-runoff voting]]). For example, Approval and Range voting allow the voter to rate any candidate with a zero, which effectively does not give those candidates any advantage and does not harm the chances of the positively rated candidates.  Voter-truncated Borda count from the low rankings allows the voter to not rank any candidate, thus giving those candidates no points in the tallies, but gives the supported candidates the same high-ranking point values as a standard Borda count.

Revision as of 11:56, 10 September 2005

The Non-compulsory support criterion was devised in 2005 by Thomas Smith. A voting method satisfies the Non-compulsory Support criterion if it provides a means for the voter to exclude one or more candidates from supportive ranking or rating, and by doing so, not causing harm to any supported candidates or help to non-supported candidates. Methods that satisfy this criterion include Approval voting, Range voting, Bucklin voting, and Borda count that is voter truncated from the low rankings. Methods that do not satisfy this criterion include Condorcet methods, plurality voting, standard Borda count, modified Borda count (voter truncated from the high rankings) and Single Transferable Vote methods (such as Instant-runoff voting). For example, Approval and Range voting allow the voter to rate any candidate with a zero, which effectively does not give those candidates any advantage and does not harm the chances of the positively rated candidates. Voter-truncated Borda count from the low rankings allows the voter to not rank any candidate, thus giving those candidates no points in the tallies, but gives the supported candidates the same high-ranking point values as a standard Borda count.