Method evaluation poll

From Electowiki
Revision as of 05:46, 14 June 2005 by James Green-Armytage (talk | contribs) (Particular methods)

Jump to: navigation, search

Particular methods

Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone. (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)

The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like.

binary input

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
Plurality
           ?
Two round runoff
           ?
Approval
           ?

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
Borda count
           ? 
IRV without equal rankings
           ? 
ER-IRV(whole)
           ?   
ER-IRV(fractional)
           ?
Bucklin

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
minmax(pairwise opposition)
           ?
CDTT,IRV
           ?

Condorcet-efficient

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
ranked pairs(WV)
           ? 
ranked pairs(margins)
           ?  
beatpath(WV)
           ? 
beatpath(margins)
           ? 
sequential dropping(WV)
           ? 
minmax(WV)
           ? 
   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
minmax(margins)
           ? 
Smith//minmax(WV)
           ? 
Smith//minmax(margins)
           ? 
Nanson
           ? 
Raynaud
           ?

ranking input with approval cutoff

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
definite majority choice
           ? 
approval weighted pairwise
           ? 
approval margins
           ?

rating input

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
range voting (ratings summation)
           ? 
median rating
           ? 
ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)
           ? 
beatpath(cardinal pairwise)
           ?

other

   ??  ??  ??  ??  ??
CWO-ER-IRV(whole)
           ? 
CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)
           ? 
CWO-ranked pairs(WV)
           ? 
CWO-ranked ballot plurality
           ? 
minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO
           ? 
beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO
           ?