Method evaluation poll

From Electowiki
Revision as of 05:00, 14 June 2005 by James Green-Armytage (talk | contribs) (Particlar methods)

Jump to: navigation, search

Particular methods

Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)

binary input

   SR  JH  JG  KV  MO
Plurality
           ?
Two round runoff
           ?
Approval
           ?

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Borda count
           ? 
IRV without equal rankings
           ? 
ER-IRV(whole)
           ?   
ER-IRV(fractional)

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
minmax(pairwise opposition)
           ?
CDTT,IRV
           ?

Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
ranked pairs(WV)
           ? 
ranked pairs(margins)
           ?  
beatpath(WV)
           ? 
beatpath(margins)
           ? 
sequential dropping(WV)
           ? 
minmax(WV)
           ? 
   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
minmax(margins)
           ? 
Smith//minmax(WV)
           ? 
Smith//minmax(margins)
           ? 
Nanson
           ? 
Raynaud
           ?

ranking input with approval cutoff

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Definite majority choice
           ? 
Approval weighted pairwise
           ? 
Approval margins
           ? 

rating input

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
range voting
           ? 
ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)
           ? 
beatpath(cardinal pairwise)
           ? 

other

  SR  JH  JG  KV  MO
CWO-ER-IRV(whole)
           ? 
CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)
           ? 
CWO-ranked pairs(WV)
           ? 
CWO-ranked ballot plurality
           ? 
minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO
           ? 
beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO
           ?