Difference between revisions of "Method evaluation poll"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(not Condorcet-efficient: add two versions of ER-Bucklin)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
     JG  CB  KV  DK  MO
 
     JG  CB  KV  DK  MO
 
  [[Plurality]]
 
  [[Plurality]]
     2    2    2    2
+
     2    2    2    2   0
 
  [[Runoff voting|Two round runoff]]
 
  [[Runoff voting|Two round runoff]]
     3    5    3    3
+
     3    5    3    3     0
 
  [[Approval voting|Approval]]
 
  [[Approval voting|Approval]]
     5?    6    8    5    7
+
     5?    6    8    5    9
 
  [[Random Ballot|Random Ballot]]
 
  [[Random Ballot|Random Ballot]]
     1    1    1    1
+
     1    1    1    1     0
  
 
=== ranking input ===
 
=== ranking input ===
Line 29: Line 29:
 
==== not Condorcet-efficient ====
 
==== not Condorcet-efficient ====
  
     JG  CB  KV  DK   
+
     JG  CB  KV  DK  MO
  [[Borda count]]
+
  [[Borda count]]    
     1    3    0    0
+
     1    3    0    0    0
 
  [[IRV]] without equal rankings
 
  [[IRV]] without equal rankings
     4    7    3    3
+
     4    7    3    3     0
 
  ER-IRV(whole)
 
  ER-IRV(whole)
     6    4    ?    ?
+
     6    4    ?    ?     0
 
  ER-IRV(fractional)
 
  ER-IRV(fractional)
     6    6    3    ?
+
     6    6    3    ?     0
 
  [[Bucklin voting|Bucklin]] without equal rankings
 
  [[Bucklin voting|Bucklin]] without equal rankings
   3?    6.5  6    0
+
   3?    6.5  6    0      
 
  [[ER-Bucklin|ER-Bucklin(whole)]]
 
  [[ER-Bucklin|ER-Bucklin(whole)]]
  5.5?
+
  5.5?                     2
 
  [[ER-Bucklin|ER-Bucklin(fractional)]]
 
  [[ER-Bucklin|ER-Bucklin(fractional)]]
 
     ?
 
     ?
Line 49: Line 49:
 
     JG  CB  KV  DK  MO  
 
     JG  CB  KV  DK  MO  
 
  [[MMPO|minmax(pairwise opposition)]]
 
  [[MMPO|minmax(pairwise opposition)]]
     5    4    5    ?    6
+
     5    4    5    ?     
 
  [[CDTT|CDTT,IRV]]
 
  [[CDTT|CDTT,IRV]]
 
     7    9    6    ?
 
     7    9    6    ?
Line 57: Line 57:
 
     6?        9    ?
 
     6?        9    ?
 
  [[Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval]] ([[MDDA]])
 
  [[Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval]] ([[MDDA]])
     6?  7.5?  9
+
     6?  7.5?  9       10
  
 
==== Condorcet-efficient ====
 
==== Condorcet-efficient ====
Line 93: Line 93:
 
   6.5  8.5    6    3
 
   6.5  8.5    6    3
 
  [[CWP|approval weighted pairwise]] (e.g. with ranked pairs base)
 
  [[CWP|approval weighted pairwise]] (e.g. with ranked pairs base)
     9    8    7    3
+
     9    8    7    3    3
 
  [[approval margins]]
 
  [[approval margins]]
 
   5.5    9    ?    3
 
   5.5    9    ?    3
Line 101: Line 101:
 
=== rating input ===
 
=== rating input ===
  
     JG  KV  DK
+
     JG  KV  DK   MO
 
  [[range voting]] (ratings summation)
 
  [[range voting]] (ratings summation)
   5.5    5    2
+
   5.5    5    2   8.75
 
  [[Median Ratings|median ratings]]
 
  [[Median Ratings|median ratings]]
 
     3    4    2
 
     3    4    2
 
  ranked pairs([[cardinal pairwise]])
 
  ranked pairs([[cardinal pairwise]])
   9.5    5    2
+
   9.5    5    2   4
 
  beatpath([[cardinal pairwise]])
 
  beatpath([[cardinal pairwise]])
   9.5    5    2
+
   9.5    5    2   4
  
 
=== other ===
 
=== other ===
Line 115: Line 115:
 
     JG  DK  MO
 
     JG  DK  MO
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ER-IRV(whole)
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ER-IRV(whole)
     7    1
+
     7    1   4
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ER-IRV(fractional)
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ER-IRV(fractional)
     8    1
+
     8    1   4
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ranked pairs(WV)
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ranked pairs(WV)
     8    1
+
     8    1   5
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ranked ballot plurality
 
  [[candidate withdrawal option|CWO]]-ranked ballot plurality
 
     6    1
 
     6    1
 
  [[MMPO|minmax(pairwise opposition)]] with [[AERLO and ATLO]]
 
  [[MMPO|minmax(pairwise opposition)]] with [[AERLO and ATLO]]
     4    ?    9
+
     4    ?     
 
  [[MMPO]] with AERLO, ATLO, & [[Power Truncation]]
 
  [[MMPO]] with AERLO, ATLO, & [[Power Truncation]]
     ?        10
+
     ?         
 
  [[MMPO]] with (only) [[Power Truncation]]  
 
  [[MMPO]] with (only) [[Power Truncation]]  
     ?        8
+
     ?         
 
  [[beatpath]](WV) with AERLO and ATLO
 
  [[beatpath]](WV) with AERLO and ATLO
     8    ?
+
     8    ?   4
 
  [[beatpath]](WV) with [[strong/weak preference option]]
 
  [[beatpath]](WV) with [[strong/weak preference option]]
   7.5    ?
+
   7.5    ?   4
 
  [[random jury]] method
 
  [[random jury]] method
     ?
+
     ?         1
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
  
 
[[Essential Questions]] poll
 
[[Essential Questions]] poll

Revision as of 20:06, 30 June 2005

Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on functional merit alone. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.

The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like. You may leave a question mark next to your score for a given method if you are particularly uncertain about that score, and you may also substitute a question mark for the number if you feel unable to evalute the method.

Feel free to add more methods to the poll, especially interesting ones! This goes without saying, but please don't change other people's ratings! Try to keep the columns tidy so that it's clear whose scores are whose. The format of this poll is based on that of the essential questions poll. Please identify yourself by your initials in the body of the poll, and in the participants section at the top of the poll. This poll will be ongoing; that is, it has no closing date. Also, there is no official tally method, and no official winner will be declared.

the participants

JG James Green-Armytage
CB Chris Benham
KV Kevin Venzke
DK Dave Ketchum
MO Mike Ossipoff 

the methods

binary input

   JG   CB   KV   DK   MO
Plurality
    2    2    2    2    0
Two round runoff
    3    5    3    3     0
Approval
   5?    6    8    5    9
Random Ballot
    1    1    1    1     0 

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   JG   CB   KV   DK   MO
Borda count     
   1     3    0    0     0
IRV without equal rankings
   4     7    3    3     0
ER-IRV(whole)
   6     4    ?    ?      0
ER-IRV(fractional)
   6     6    3    ?      0
Bucklin without equal rankings
  3?    6.5   6    0       
ER-Bucklin(whole)
5.5?                      2
ER-Bucklin(fractional)
   ?

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   JG   CB   KV   DK   MO 
minmax(pairwise opposition)
    5    4    5    ?    
CDTT,IRV
    7    9    6    ?
CDTT,minmax(pairwise opposition)
    ?    5    7    ?
Condorcet//approval with FBC patch ("tied at the top" rule)
   6?         9    ?
Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval (MDDA)
   6?   7.5?   9        10

Condorcet-efficient

   JG   CB   KV   DK   MO
ranked pairs(WV)
    7    7    8    8    4
ranked pairs(margins)
    2    4    3    3    0
river(wv)
    7         8    7    4
beatpath(WV)
    7    7    8    7    4
beatpath(margins)  
    2    4    3    3    0
sequential dropping(WV)
    7    ?    7    ?    4
minmax(WV)                  
    4   ?     7    7    3
minmax(margins)     
    1    ?    3    3    0
Smith//minmax(WV)    
    6    ?    7    ?  3.5
Smith//minmax(margins)
    2    ?    3    ?    0
Nanson
  5.5?   ?    3    ?    0
Raynaud
   6?    ?    3    3    0

ranking input with approval cutoff

   JG   CB   KV   DK  
definite majority choice a.k.a. ranked approval voting
  6.5  8.5    6    3
approval weighted pairwise (e.g. with ranked pairs base)
    9    8    7    3     3
approval margins
  5.5    9    ?    3
democratic fair choice (DFC)
   ?          3    3

rating input

   JG   KV   DK   MO
range voting (ratings summation)
  5.5    5    2   8.75
median ratings
    3    4    2
ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)
  9.5    5    2    4
beatpath(cardinal pairwise)
  9.5    5    2    4

other

   JG   DK   MO
CWO-ER-IRV(whole)
    7    1    4
CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)
    8    1    4
CWO-ranked pairs(WV)
    8    1    5
CWO-ranked ballot plurality
    6    1
minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO
    4    ?    
MMPO with AERLO, ATLO, & Power Truncation
    ?        
MMPO with (only) Power Truncation 
    ?         
beatpath(WV) with AERLO and ATLO
    8    ?    4
beatpath(WV) with strong/weak preference option
  7.5    ?    4
random jury method
    ?         1

See also

Essential Questions poll