Difference between revisions of "Method evaluation poll"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Condorcet-efficient: adjust my ratings...)
m (Method evalutaion poll)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Method evalutaion poll ==
 
== Method evalutaion poll ==
  
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on '''merit alone'''. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?  
+
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on '''merit alone'''. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.
  
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like.
+
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like.  
  
 
Feel free to add new methods, especially interesting ones!
 
Feel free to add new methods, especially interesting ones!

Revision as of 15:15, 14 June 2005

Method evalutaion poll

Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.

The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like.

Feel free to add new methods, especially interesting ones!

binary input

   JG       CB    ??   ??   ??
Plurality
    2       2
Two round runoff
    3       5
Approval
    5       6
Random Ballot
    1       1

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   JG     CB   ??   ??   ??
Borda count
   1       4 
IRV without equal rankings
   4       7 
ER-IRV(whole)
   6       4   
ER-IRV(fractional)
   6       6
Bucklin
   3       6

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   JG      CB   ??   ??   ??
minmax(pairwise opposition)
    3       8
CDTT,IRV
    7      9.5

Condorcet-efficient

   JG      CB   ??   ??   ??
ranked pairs(WV)
    7       7 
ranked pairs(margins)
    2       4  
beatpath(WV)
    7       7 
beatpath(margins)
    2       4 
sequential dropping(WV)
    7       ? 
minmax(WV)
    3       ? 
minmax(margins)
    1       ? 
Smith//minmax(WV)
    6       ? 
Smith//minmax(margins)
    2       ? 
Nanson
   4?       ? 
Raynaud
   5?       ?

ranking input with approval cutoff

   JG      CB   ??   ??   ??
definite majority choice
    7      8.5 
approval weighted pairwise (e.g. with ranked pairs base)
    9       8 
approval margins
    4       9

rating input

   JG   ??   ??   ??   ??
range voting (ratings summation)
    6        
median rating
    3        
ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)
   10        
beatpath(cardinal pairwise)
   10       


other

   JG   ??   ??   ??   ??
CWO-ER-IRV(whole)
    7        
CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)
    7        
CWO-ranked pairs(WV)
    9        
CWO-ranked ballot plurality
    4        
minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO
    ?        
beatpath(WV) with AERLO and ATLO
    8       
beatpath(WV) with strong/weak preference option
    8

See also

Essential Questions poll