Difference between revisions of "Method evaluation poll"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(other)
(binary input)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
=== binary input ===
 
=== binary input ===
     SR  JH  JG  KV MO
+
     SR  JH  JG  KV MO
 
  [[Plurality]]
 
  [[Plurality]]
 +
            ?
 
  [[runoff|Two round runoff]]
 
  [[runoff|Two round runoff]]
 +
            ?
 
  [[Approval]]
 
  [[Approval]]
 +
            ?
  
 
=== ranking input ===
 
=== ranking input ===

Revision as of 04:55, 14 June 2005

Particlar methods

Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)

binary input

   SR  JH  JG  KV  MO
Plurality
           ?
Two round runoff
           ?
Approval
           ?

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Borda count
IRV without equal rankings
ER-IRV(whole)
ER-IRV(fractional)

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
minmax(pairwise opposition)
CDTT,IRV

Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
ranked pairs(WV)
ranked pairs(margins)
beatpath(WV)
beatpath(margins)
sequential dropping(WV)
minmax(WV)
   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
minmax(margins)
Smith//minmax(WV)
Smith//minmax(margins)
Nanson
Raynaud

ranking input with approval cutoff

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Definite majority choice
Approval weighted pairwise
Approval margins

rating input

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
range voting
ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)
beatpath(cardinal pairwise)

other

  SR  JH  JG  KV  MO
CWO-ER-IRV(whole)
CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)
CWO-ranked pairs(WV)
CWO-ranked ballot plurality
minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO
beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO