Difference between revisions of "Method evaluation poll"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Condorcet-efficient)
(ranking input with approval cutoff)
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 
     SR  JH  JG  KV MO
 
     SR  JH  JG  KV MO
 
+
[[Definite majority choice]]
[[Definite majority choice]]
+
[[CWP|Approval weighted pairwise]]
 
+
[[Approval margins]]
[[CWP|Approval weighted pairwise]]
 
 
 
[[Approval margins]]
 
  
 
=== rating input ===
 
=== rating input ===

Revision as of 04:52, 14 June 2005

Particlar methods

Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)

binary input

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Plurality
Two round runoff
Approval

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Borda count
IRV without equal rankings
ER-IRV(whole)
ER-IRV(fractional)

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
minmax(pairwise opposition)
CDTT,IRV

Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
ranked pairs(WV)
ranked pairs(margins)
beatpath(WV)
beatpath(margins)
sequential dropping(WV)
minmax(WV)
   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
minmax(margins)
Smith//minmax(WV)
Smith//minmax(margins)
Nanson
Raynaud

ranking input with approval cutoff

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO
Definite majority choice
Approval weighted pairwise
Approval margins

rating input

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

range voting

ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)

beatpath(cardinal pairwise)

other

CWO-ER-IRV(whole)

CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)

CWO-ranked pairs(WV)

CWO-ranked ballot plurality

minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO

beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO