Difference between revisions of "Essential Questions"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
It is meant to give a survey of the EM list members' basic opinions.
 
It is meant to give a survey of the EM list members' basic opinions.
  
Each person can add their own column and express their degree of agreement for each of the statements. For reasons of space, please just put your initials in the column's head.  
+
Each person can add their own column and express their degree of agreement below each of the statements. For reasons of space, please just put your initials in the column's head.  
  
 
When you add a new statement about some essential property of election methods, please try to formulate it as clear as possible, using as few ambiguous terms as possible, and keep the list sorted by groups of related statements.
 
When you add a new statement about some essential property of election methods, please try to formulate it as clear as possible, using as few ambiguous terms as possible, and keep the list sorted by groups of related statements.
Line 24: Line 24:
 
  STATEMENT
 
  STATEMENT
 
   DEGREE OF AGREEMENT BY... (INITIALS)
 
   DEGREE OF AGREEMENT BY... (INITIALS)
 +
 +
* What information should be used?
 +
 
   JH ??
 
   JH ??
 
 
  Pairwise preference information should be used
 
  Pairwise preference information should be used
 
     +  ?
 
     +  ?
Line 33: Line 35:
 
     -  ?
 
     -  ?
 
   
 
   
 +
* What about certain types of "winners" and "losers"?
 +
 +
  JH ??
 
  Beats-All Winners must win with certainty
 
  Beats-All Winners must win with certainty
 
     -  ?  
 
     -  ?  
Line 39: Line 44:
 
  Approval Winners must not lose with certainty
 
  Approval Winners must not lose with certainty
 
     +  ?
 
     +  ?
 
 
  Beaten-By-All Losers must not win
 
  Beaten-By-All Losers must not win
 
     ?  ?
 
     ?  ?
Line 50: Line 54:
 
  An Approval Loser must not win unless s/he is a Condorcet Winner
 
  An Approval Loser must not win unless s/he is a Condorcet Winner
 
     +  ?
 
     +  ?
+
 
 +
* What other special properties should the winner have?
 +
 
 +
  JH ??
 
  The winner must belong to the Smith/Gotcha/Getcha/Top Set
 
  The winner must belong to the Smith/Gotcha/Getcha/Top Set
 
     -  ?
 
     -  ?
 +
The winner must be top on at least one ballot
 +
    ?  ?
 +
 +
* What effects should certain manipulations have?
 
   
 
   
 +
  JH ??
 
  Cloning must not affect the other candidates' winning probabilities
 
  Cloning must not affect the other candidates' winning probabilities
 
   ++  ?
 
   ++  ?
 
 
  Raising X on one ballot without changing anything else must not decrease X's winning probability
 
  Raising X on one ballot without changing anything else must not decrease X's winning probability
 
   ++  ?
 
   ++  ?

Revision as of 02:35, 11 June 2005

This is under construction and will be announced soon on EM-list.

This is a dynamic list of possible statements about what election methods should be like. It is meant to give a survey of the EM list members' basic opinions.

Each person can add their own column and express their degree of agreement below each of the statements. For reasons of space, please just put your initials in the column's head.

When you add a new statement about some essential property of election methods, please try to formulate it as clear as possible, using as few ambiguous terms as possible, and keep the list sorted by groups of related statements.

Please do not change the wording of statements as soon as someone expressed a degree of agreement. If you do, please announce on EM list, add a new line of degrees of agreement and put the old line of degrees of agreement in brackets.


DEGREES OF AGREEMENT

++  I agree strongly
 +  I rather agree
 0  I am indifferent about this
 -  I rather disagree
--  I disagree strongly

 ?  I am undecided about this


STATEMENT
  DEGREE OF AGREEMENT BY... (INITIALS)
  • What information should be used?
  JH ??
Pairwise preference information should be used
   +  ?
Approval information should be used
  ++  ?
Cardinal ratings information should be used
   -  ?

  • What about certain types of "winners" and "losers"?
  JH ??
Beats-All Winners must win with certainty
   -  ? 
Beats-All Winners must not lose with certainty
  ++  ?
Approval Winners must not lose with certainty
   +  ?
Beaten-By-All Losers must not win
   ?  ?
A Beaten-By-All Loser must not win unless s/he is an Approval Winner
  ++  ? 
Beaten-By-All Losers must have winning probability less than 1/2
   +  ?
Approval Losers must not win
   -  ?
An Approval Loser must not win unless s/he is a Condorcet Winner
   +  ?
  • What other special properties should the winner have?
  JH ??
The winner must belong to the Smith/Gotcha/Getcha/Top Set
   -  ?
The winner must be top on at least one ballot
   ?  ?
  • What effects should certain manipulations have?
  JH ??
Cloning must not affect the other candidates' winning probabilities
  ++  ?
Raising X on one ballot without changing anything else must not decrease X's winning probability
  ++  ?
Adding a ballot which only ranks X must not decrease X's winning probability
  ++  ?
Adding a ballot saying "X>(whatever)" must not decrease X's winning probability
   ?  ?
Changing a ballot which only ranks X to "X>(whatever)" must not decrease X's winning probability
   -  ?