Difference between revisions of "Essential Questions"

From Electowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
     -  ?
 
     -  ?
 
   
 
   
  Condorcet Winners must win with certainty
+
  Beats-All Winners must win with certainty
 
     -  ?  
 
     -  ?  
  Condorcet Winners must not lose with certainty
+
  Beats-All Winners must not lose with certainty
 
   ++  ?
 
   ++  ?
 
  Approval Winners must not lose with certainty
 
  Approval Winners must not lose with certainty
 
     +  ?
 
     +  ?
 
   
 
   
  Condorcet Losers must not win
+
  Beaten-By-All Losers must not win
 
     ?  ?
 
     ?  ?
  A Condorcet Loser must not win unless s/he is an Approval Winner
+
  A Beaten-By-All Loser must not win unless s/he is an Approval Winner
 
   ++  ?  
 
   ++  ?  
  Condorcet Losers must have winning probability less than 1/2
+
  Beaten-By-All Losers must have winning probability less than 1/2
 
     +  ?
 
     +  ?
 
  Approval Losers must not win
 
  Approval Losers must not win

Revision as of 23:39, 10 June 2005

This is under construction and will be announced soon on EM-list.


LEGEND

++  I agree strongly
 +  I rather agree
 0  I am indifferent about this
 -  I rather disagree
--  I disagree strongly

 ?  I am undecided about this


STATEMENT
  DEGREE OF AGREEMENT BY... (INITIALS)
  JH ??

Pairwise preference information should be used
   +  ?
Approval information should be used
  ++  ?
Cardinal ratings information should be used
   -  ?

Beats-All Winners must win with certainty
   -  ? 
Beats-All Winners must not lose with certainty
  ++  ?
Approval Winners must not lose with certainty
   +  ?

Beaten-By-All Losers must not win
   ?  ?
A Beaten-By-All Loser must not win unless s/he is an Approval Winner
  ++  ? 
Beaten-By-All Losers must have winning probability less than 1/2
   +  ?
Approval Losers must not win
   -  ?
An Approval Loser must not win unless s/he is a Condorcet Winner
   +  ?

The winner must belong to the Smith/Gotcha/Getcha/Top Set
   -  ?

Cloning must not affect the other candidates' winning probabilities
  ++  ?

Raising X on one ballot without changing anything else must not decrease X's winning probability
  ++  ?
Adding a ballot which only ranks X must not decrease X's winning probability
  ++  ?
Adding a ballot saying "X>(whatever)" must not decrease X's winning probability
   ?  ?
Changing a ballot which only ranks X to "X>(whatever)" must not decrease X's winning probability
   -  ?